Note: This historical image is not a factually accurate paleontological restoration.
Reason: Large proboscis (misinterpretation of walking leg according to Ma et al. 2013, not evident according to Ou & Mayer 2018); Walking legs with more than 15 annulation (maximum number 15 according to Ma et al. 2013).
You may ask further questions about the accuracy of this image at the image review page of Wikiproject Palaeontology on the English Wikipedia. Note that this image may be appropriate to illustrate obsolete paleontological views.